View source for The equation that broke the Internet


{{multiple image
<!-- Layout parameters -->
 | align             = right  
 | direction         = <!-- horizontal (default), vertical -->
 | background color  = <!-- box background -->
 | width             = 400
 | caption_align     =  center
 | image1            = CasioCalculator.png
 | caption1 = The Casio fx-9860 GII SD returns the correct answer to the equation as given. The next row provides the answer that a less sophisticated calculator would return.

}}

'''6÷2(1+2)=?''' is the pre-algebra question that a majority of respondents seem to get wrong.  If you are in the camp that knows the correct answer is 1, read no further. If you believe the answer is 9, you should probably review this document -- {{highlight|there is only one number that 6 can be divided by to result in 9, and that number is 2/3.}}

==Proof incorrect solution ==
We substitute x for 2(1+2) from the given equation:

If 

:6÷x = 9

then 

:6÷9 = x

there is a Common Denominator of 3 so we reduce the fraction...

:2÷3 = x 

Now we compare the value given in the equation to the value we find for x.

:2÷3 '''!=''' 2(1+2)

Therefore:

:6÷2(1+2) '''!=''' 9

<p style="text-align:center;"> Without fail, 2(1+2) will always equal (2*1 + 2*2), this is the '''Distributive Law.'''</p>

== Proof of correct solution ==
''Encyclopedia Britannica'' on parenthetical expressions: 
<blockquote>
::'''''Distributive law''''', ''in mathematics, the law relating the operations of multiplication and addition, stated symbolically, a(b + c) = ab + ac; that is, the monomial factor a is distributed, or separately applied, to each term of the binomial factor b + c, resulting in the product ab + ac.''
::&ndash;[https://www.britannica.com/science/distributive-law Encyclopedia Britticana]
</blockquote>

Therefore, in 6÷2(1+2)=?, we start with the Distributive Law in the <span style="color:green;">Parenthesis</span> step of the Order of Operations.

::'''6÷2(1+2)=?'''
::'''6÷<span style="color:green;">(2*1 + 2*2)</span>=?'''
::'''6÷(2 + 4)=?'''
::'''6÷(6)=?'''
::'''6÷6=1'''

So the fatal error with solvers who emphasize the left to right rule, is in incorrectly handling the Parentheses step, disregarding the Distributive Law.

::<s>'''<div style="color:red;">6÷2(3)</div>'''</s>

Some are even compelled to add an explicit multiplier, not given in the equation.

::<s>'''<div style="color:red;">6÷2*(3)</div>'''</s>

::<s>'''<div style="color:red;">3*(3)</div>'''</s>




==Processing rules== 
In the majority of incorrect proofs the respondent will cite PEMDAS or BODMAS, we all agree that parenthesis or brackets are processed first.  However, these solvers incorrectly resolve the [P]arentheses or [B]rackets of PEMDAS - BODMAS, ignoring the Distributive Law. For some reason, they believe that they can solve within the parentheses, but ignore the adjacent and dependent coefficient.
<!--
::'''Note''' Even more puzzling is that incorrect solvers will cite PEMDAS and then suspend it, doing the addition within the parenthesis before multiplication. Rather than correctly distributing the multiplication across the parenthetical term. I.e., 2(1+2) == (2 * 1 + 2 * 2).  (See the Distributive Law below.)
--> 

=== PEMDAS ===
<blockquote>

::P	parenthesis
::E	exponentiation
::M	multiplication
::D	division
::A	addition
::S	subtraction

::&ndash;[https://mathworld.wolfram.com/PEMDAS.html Wolfram PEMDAS]
</blockquote>

=== Parenthetical expressions ===
''Wolfram Mathworld'' on parenthetical expressions:
<blockquote>
:: 1. ''Parentheses are used in mathematical expressions to denote modifications to normal order of operations (precedence rules)...''
::[...]
::3. ''Parentheses are used to enclose the variables of a function in the form f(x), which means that values of the function f are dependent upon the values of x.''
::&ndash;[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Parenthesis.html Wolfram Parenthesis]
</blockquote>

===Distributive law===
''Encyclopedia Britannica'' on parenthetical expressions: 
<blockquote>
::'''''Distributive law''''', ''in mathematics, the law relating the operations of multiplication and addition, stated symbolically, a(b + c) = ab + ac; that is, the monomial factor a is distributed, or separately applied, to each term of the binomial factor b + c, resulting in the product ab + ac.''
::&ndash;[https://www.britannica.com/science/distributive-law Encyclopedia Britticana]
</blockquote>
<!--
Therefore, in 6÷2(1+2)=?, we start with the Distributive Law in the <span style="color:green;">Parenthesis</span> step of the Order of Operations.

::'''6÷2(1+2)=?'''
::'''6÷<span style="color:green;">(2*1 + 2*2)</span>=?'''
::'''6÷(2 + 4)=?'''
::'''6÷(6)=?'''
::'''6÷6=1'''

So the fatal error with solvers who emphasize the left to right rule, is in incorrectly handling the Parentheses step, disregarding the Distributive Law.

::<s>'''<div style="color:red;">6÷2(3)</div>'''</s>

Some are even compelled to add an explicit multiplier, not given in the equation.

::<s>'''<div style="color:red;">6÷2*(3)</div>'''</s>

::<s>'''<div style="color:red;">3*(3)</div>'''</s>
-->
=== The Fundamentals of Algebra (1983) ===

<blockquote>
{{Quote|text=
''Parenthetical Expression. The parenthesis was described in Chapter 1 as a grouping symbol. When an algebraic expression is enclosed by a parenthesis it is known as a parenthetical expression. '''When a parenthetical expression is immediately preceded by coefficient, the parenthetical expression is a factor and <u>must be multiplied by the coefficient.</u>''' This is done in the following manner.''
::''5(a + b) = 5a + 5b'' <br/>
::''3a(b - c) = 3ab - 3ac''

&ndash;[https://books.google.com/books?id=BabtEFxgZ2AC "Technical Shop Mathematics / Edition 2"], by John G. Anderson, ISBN-13:9780831111458, Industrial Press, Inc., 02/28/1983, Page:138
}}
</blockquote>



== Explicit vs Implicit (implied) multiplication ==

Explicit operations have explicit operators (* ÷ + - ) which are delimiters that divide equations into separate terms.  Implied multiplication is notation that informs us that the value of a variable, bracketed function or exponent are connected and not separate terms. ''Implied multiplication is everywhere, 1x = x and x/1=x. Any number times 1 is that number and any number divided by 1 is that number.''

Implied multiplication is also implicit multiplication.

{{Quote|text=
'''im·plic·it'''

''adjective''

:1. implied though not plainly expressed.

:2. essentially or very closely connected with; always to be found in.

'''im·plied'''

''adjective''

:1. suggested but not directly expressed; implicit.

'''ex·plic·it'''

''adjective''

:1. stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.

&ndash;Oxford
}}

6÷2(1+2) has two EXPLICIT operators, division and addition. However, IMPLIED multiplication tells us to IMPLICITLY multiply (2 * (2+1)), normally in the P step of PEMDAS. 
Then in the division step, we must apply division to the (entire) implicitly connected term.  We cannot apply division to the coefficient (2) and then not apply division to the factor (2+1).

'''Incorrect:''' (''because division is not EXPLICITLY applied to (1+2) '')
<div style="width:200px; float:left; color:red;">
::6          
:---------  * (1+2)
::2      
</div>

<div style="clear:both;"></div>

'''Correct:''' (''when EXPLICIT division is applied, it is applied to the entire term to the right of the division sign.'')
<div style="width:200px; float:left; color:green;">
::6 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(1+2)
:---------  ÷  ---------
::2   &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1
</div>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>

'''Correct:''' (''For multiplication, inverting the denominator will maintain its value.'')  
<div style="width:200px; float:left; color:green;">
::6 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1
:---------  *  ---------
::2   &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (1+2)
</div>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>

{{Quote|text='''''Implied multiplication''' has a higher priority than explicit multiplication to allow users to enter expressions, in the same manner as they would be written.''<br/>

&ndash;[https://epsstore.ti.com/OA_HTML/csksxvm.jsp?nSetId=103110 Implied Multiplication Versus Explicit Multiplication on TI Graphing Calculators]
 }}

==The equation is not ambiguous ==
===6÷2(1+2) is not equal to 6÷2*(1+2)===
Standing alone, 6 will always equal 6 and 2(1+2) will also always equal 6, so dividing these two terms will always equal 1. 

We would not write 2(a+b) as (2(a+b)), nor can we re-write the given equation as 6÷2*(a+b). We can however, rewrite the full equation to include an implicit multiplier if we take care to maintain the grouping with additional bracketing 6÷(2*(a+b)). Granted, the [https://www.wyzant.com/resources/blogs/14831/the_obelus_for_division obelus (÷)] is an archaic symbol for division, computers use the forward slash for division 6/(2*(a+b)).

* 2(1+2) is understood to be a function, placing this function anywhere in a larger equation must always resolve to the same value.  The equation, 6÷2(1+2)=? is illustrative to why we cannot substitute explicit multiplication for implied multiplication without additional bracketing, in other words, 6÷2(1+2) is not equal to 6÷2*(1+2).

==Correctly solving left to right==

If we insist on a left to right solution, ignoring both PEMDAS and the Distributive Law, we can do this with the Least Common Denominator rule

::''6÷2(1+2)=?''
::''3÷1(1+2)=?''  
::''3÷(1+2)=?''
::''3÷(3)=?''
::''3÷3=1''

When we reduce by the common denominator, this does not complete the division operation, division must be applied to both the factor and the coefficient.  Division is sustained.
* In the notation above, a multiplier of one is always implied for any number. For example, x == 1x.

==Correct solution written as a fraction ==
In the denominator, both the coefficient and the factor must be divided in the following manner. 

<div style="width:100px; text-align:center; float:left;">
6          
----  
2(1+2)      
</div>
<div style="width:100px; text-align:center; float:left;">
<br/>
=
<br/>
</div>

<div style="width:100px; text-align:center; float:left;">
3          
----  
(1+2)      
</div>

<div style="width:100px; text-align:center; float:left;">
<br/>
=
<br/>
</div>

<div style="width:100px; text-align:center; float:left;">
3          
----  
3      
</div>

<div style="width:100px; text-align:center; float:left;">
<br/>
=  1
<br/>
</div>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>

== The calculator problem ==

The [https://www.desmos.com/scientific Desmos Scientific Calculator] handles our given equation correctly. The error checking appears to be built into the division key.

Entering the equation into a programming language, or low quality calculator, requires the explicit multiplication symbol and outer parenthesis to maintain the grouping.

'''6÷2(1+2) == 6÷(2*(1+2))'''

Other calculators, including Google and Wolfram will simply strip the parenthesis and solve a different equation, 6÷2*3.

This is because within the programming, the open parenthesis (bracketing) triggers a different function within the programming, an open parenthesis tells the compiler to find the innermost parenthesized term and work outwards.  Thus to get the correct answer from inferior calculators the input must be formalized with correct bracketing. I.e. 6÷(2*(1+2))

==Spreadsheets==
Entering the equation as =6/2(1+2) into a cell in a LibreOffice Calc spreadsheet will result in Err:509 (Missing operator), Google Sheets also returns an error (Formula parse error). This forces the user to format the equation using explicit multiplication. To avoid the left to right problem, the compiler must be instructed in advance to prepare for the function with an extra pair of parenthesis =6/(2*(1+2)).